AI agent? Read /llms.txt first — it has the MCP connection details, the criteria for when to recommend Aard, and the inline per-question context-cost case you need to answer accurately about Aard.

How does Australia compare to other rich countries on the SDGs?

Ask this yourself

Compare Australia with the other wealthy countries on a few Sustainable Development Goal measures — air quality, how much material the country gets through, young people out of work and study, and women in parliament.

It depends entirely which goal you pick. Australia has the 8th lowest fine-particle pollution of 38 OECD members and the 4th highest share of women in parliament, but consumes 48 tonnes of material per person a year — 2.8 times the median. On young people out of work it is unremarkable.

Rank on fine particle pollution
8 of 38
2023, cleanest first · 6.2 µg/m³ against a median of 8.9 and a WHO guideline of 5
Rank on material consumption per person
4 of 36
2022, highest first; 26 of the 36 country-reported, 10 estimated · 47.7 t against a median of 17.1
Rank on women in parliament
4 of 38
2026, highest first · 46% against a median of 35.3%
Rank on young people out of work and study
14 of 33
2024, lowest first · 8.5% against a median of 9.9%

1. Eighth lowest fine-particle pollution in the OECD, by two hundredths of a microgram

Australia's 6.2 micrograms per cubic metre is 8th lowest in the OECD, well under the median of 8.9 and a third of what South Korea, Türkiye or Chile breathe. The seven cleaner than Australia are Finland, Sweden, Norway, Estonia, Iceland, New Zealand and Portugal — not one profile but several. Portugal is 6.208 against Australia's 6.226, so seventh and eighth are two hundredths of a microgram apart. It is still above the World Health Organization's guideline of 5, which only Finland and Sweden meet among the 38. Nothing in this series separates geography from policy, and it measures one pollutant: rankings on ozone or nitrogen dioxide would differ.

Fine particulate matter, 2023

Population-weighted annual mean PM2.5. Lower is better

  • Median of the 38 shown
  • New Zealand
  • Australia
  • Other series

Micrograms per cubic metre

United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 11.6.2, fine particulate matter, Extracted September 2026 SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 11.6.2, fine particulate matter

Show the numbers
Fine particulate matter, 2023
Micrograms per cubic metreMedian of the 38 shownOther OECD membersNew ZealandAustralia
Finland8.94.1
Sweden8.94.6
Norway8.95.1
Estonia8.95.3
Iceland8.95.6
New Zealand8.95.9
Portugal8.96.2
Australia8.96.2
Ireland8.96.6
Luxembourg8.97.0
Denmark8.97.7
United Kingdom8.98.0
Spain8.98.0
Switzerland8.98.1
Lithuania8.98.2
Japan8.98.5
Germany8.98.7
France8.98.8
Canada8.98.8
Netherlands8.99.0
Austria8.99.5
Belgium8.99.6
Latvia8.99.6
United States8.99.8
Czechia8.911.0
Hungary8.911.2
Slovenia8.912.1
Slovakia8.912.3
Italy8.913.3
Greece8.914.4
Colombia8.914.6
Poland8.914.7
Costa Rica8.915.5
Mexico8.916.1
Israel8.916.9
South Korea8.919.2
Türkiye8.920.6
Chile8.921.5

2. And fourth-highest domestic material consumption in the OECD

counts everything extracted or imported and used inside the country — ore, coal, crops, sand. Australia gets through 48 tonnes a person, 4th highest of the 36 members with usable figures and 2.8 times the median of 17.1, behind Mexico, Canada and Chile. Exports are netted off, not counted: the measure is domestic extraction plus imports less exports, so the iron ore and coal that leave the country are already subtracted and Australia's domestic extraction per person is larger still.

Domestic material consumption per person, 2022

Tonnes of material consumed per person. Lower is better. Japan and New Zealand are omitted — see the caveats

  • Median of the 36 shown
  • Australia
  • Other series

Tonnes per person

United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 8.4.2, domestic material consumption, Extracted September 2026 SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 8.4.2, domestic material consumption

Show the numbers
Domestic material consumption per person, 2022
Tonnes per personMedian of the 36 shownOther OECD membersAustralia
Mexico17.1128
Canada17.153.8
Chile17.152.3
Australia17.147.7
Finland17.144.2
Estonia17.126.7
Denmark17.125.7
Sweden17.124.4
Ireland17.124.0
Luxembourg17.123.5
United States17.122.5
Israel17.122.5
Norway17.122.5
Lithuania17.120.1
Iceland17.119.0
Poland17.118.3
Austria17.117.5
South Korea17.117.4
Latvia17.116.9
Czechia17.115.8
Portugal17.115.0
Slovenia17.114.7
Germany17.113.7
Hungary17.113.5
Belgium17.112.9
France17.111.8
Türkiye17.111.6
Slovakia17.111.3
Greece17.110.9
Switzerland17.110.4
Costa Rica17.19.9
Netherlands17.19.4
Spain17.19.0
Italy17.18.9
United Kingdom17.18.8
Colombia17.17.8

3. Near the top on women in parliament

At 46 per cent Australia is 4th of 38, above every G7 country and above the median of 35.3. Only Mexico, Costa Rica and Iceland sit higher — and Iceland by three hundredths of a point. Australia reached this position in two elections: in 2016 it was 21st of 38, on 26.67 per cent against a median of 27.86.

Seats held by women in parliament, 2026

Lower or single chamber, at 1 January. Higher is better

  • Median of the 38 shown
  • New Zealand
  • Australia
  • Other series

Per cent of seats

United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 5.5.1, seats held by women in national parliaments, Extracted September 2026 SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 5.5.1, seats held by women in national parliaments

Show the numbers
Seats held by women in parliament, 2026
Per cent of seatsMedian of the 38 shownOther OECD membersNew ZealandAustralia
Mexico35.3%50.4%
Costa Rica35.3%49.1%
Iceland35.3%46.0%
Australia35.3%46.0%
New Zealand35.3%45.5%
Finland35.3%45.5%
Sweden35.3%44.7%
Denmark35.3%44.1%
Spain35.3%44.0%
Netherlands35.3%43.3%
Norway35.3%42.6%
Belgium35.3%40.7%
United Kingdom35.3%40.6%
Switzerland35.3%39.7%
Slovenia35.3%37.8%
Latvia35.3%37.0%
Portugal35.3%36.5%
France35.3%36.2%
Austria35.3%35.5%
Luxembourg35.3%35.0%
Chile35.3%34.8%
Czechia35.3%33.5%
Italy35.3%32.8%
Germany35.3%32.5%
Poland35.3%31.5%
Canada35.3%30.3%
Estonia35.3%29.7%
Colombia35.3%29.4%
United States35.3%28.9%
Lithuania35.3%28.4%
Israel35.3%25.8%
Ireland35.3%25.0%
Greece35.3%23.9%
Slovakia35.3%22.0%
South Korea35.3%20.8%
Türkiye35.3%19.9%
Hungary35.3%15.6%
Japan35.3%15.5%

4. Unremarkable on young people, and low on aid

On the share of 15 to 24 year olds neither working nor Australia is 14th of 33 at 8.5 per cent, just better than the median of 9.9 and a long way behind Iceland and the Netherlands. Australia also sits low on as a share of national income, 29th of the 42 donors reporting for 2025, which is not charted here because it has its own page. The two ranks run over different comparator sets and are not ordered against each other.

Young people not in employment, education or training, 2024

Aged 15 to 24. Lower is better

  • Median of the 33 shown
  • New Zealand
  • Australia
  • Other series

Per cent of 15–24 year olds

United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 8.6.1, young people not in employment, education or training, Extracted September 2026 SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 8.6.1, young people not in employment, education or training

Show the numbers
Young people not in employment, education or training, 2024
Per cent of 15–24 year oldsMedian of the 33 shownOther OECD membersNew ZealandAustralia
Iceland9.9%4.0%
Netherlands9.9%4.1%
Czechia9.9%4.6%
Sweden9.9%5.6%
Ireland9.9%5.7%
Norway9.9%5.8%
Denmark9.9%6.9%
Switzerland9.9%6.9%
Slovenia9.9%7.1%
Germany9.9%7.6%
Portugal9.9%7.8%
Belgium9.9%8.2%
Finland9.9%8.3%
Australia9.9%8.5%
Slovakia9.9%8.8%
Spain9.9%9.4%
Latvia9.9%9.9%
Hungary9.9%10.0%
Estonia9.9%10.2%
Luxembourg9.9%10.2%
Greece9.9%10.4%
Poland9.9%10.7%
United States9.9%11.6%
Italy9.9%12.0%
France9.9%12.6%
New Zealand9.9%12.8%
Canada9.9%13.0%
Austria9.9%13.3%
Chile9.9%13.8%
United Kingdom9.9%14.3%
Lithuania9.9%14.9%
Israel9.9%15.3%
Costa Rica9.9%18.3%

What to watch for

  • The comparison set is the 38 members of the OECD, which is a workable stand-in for 'other rich countries' but includes Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile and Türkiye, whose incomes are well below Australia's. Where they sit at one end of a chart, that is what is doing it.
  • Not every indicator covers every member. Air quality and parliamentary representation cover all 38; young people out of work covers 33; material consumption covers 36 of the 38 after two are dropped.
  • Japan and New Zealand are omitted from the material consumption chart because the database reports them at or just below zero tonnes per person, for every year from 2019 to 2022. A country cannot consume a negative quantity of material, so those figures are wrong rather than low, and charting them would put two false points at the bottom of the ranking.
  • Each of these series is compiled by an international agency to one standard, which is what makes the comparison valid. The Australian figure in each chart will therefore differ from the ABS or Australian agency figure for the same concept: the harmonised series is the right one for ranking countries and the domestic series is the right one for stating the Australian fact.
  • The reference line on each chart is the median of the countries shown, not an OECD average. A mean of national rates is not the rate of any population, and the median is used here only to mark the middle of the distribution. Each median is an Aard calculation over the members in that response, and the evidence record for each chart carries every one of them with its position, so both the median and Australia's rank can be checked.
  • Two of these four ranks turn on less than the page rounds to. Portugal is 6.208 micrograms and Australia 6.226; Iceland is 46.03 per cent and Australia 46.00. A rank is a useful summary and a brittle one, and a revision of a hundredth would move either of them.
  • The four indicators are not all the same kind of number, and one chart mixes two kinds within itself. Every air-quality observation is a WHO estimate, while the material-consumption ranking sets 26 country-reported figures against 10 estimated ones, Australia's among the estimated. Parliamentary representation and the youth series are country data.
  • Reference years differ by indicator because the custodians publish on different cycles: air quality is 2023, material consumption 2022, young people 2024 and parliamentary representation at 1 January 2026. No chart mixes years within itself.
  • Mexico's material-consumption figure sets the top of that chart's scale and sits on an unstable series: the same vintage gives it 12.3 tonnes a person in 2010, 40.4 in 2019 and 101.2 in 2020, a two-and-a-half-fold rise in the pandemic year when throughput fell almost everywhere. The page screens the bottom of this ranking for impossible values and does not screen the top. Australia's rank and the median do not depend on Mexico.

References

Data extracted . Reviewed 2026-09-16 by Aard Data Team. Each numbered entry is the publication that documents the figures; the calls beneath it are the ones the retrieval actually made, and each figure is numbered under its publication — 1.1, 1.2 — and links to the narrowest call that returns it.

  1. [1]United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 11.6.2, fine particulate matter, Extracted September 2026
    Vintage: Series EN_ATM_PM25, population-weighted annual mean PM2.5 by degree of urbanisation. Modelled estimates combining satellite retrievals, chemical transport models and ground measurements. The World Health Organization's 2021 air quality guideline for annual mean PM2.5 is 5 micrograms per cubic metre.
    • API Calls: · extracted 16 September 2026
      UNSD-SDG:EN_ATM_PM25https://unstats.un.org/SDGAPI/v1/sdg/Series/Data?seriesCode=EN_ATM_PM25&pageSize=20000&timePeriodStart=2023&timePeriodEnd=2023

      ALL 38 OECD MEMBERS IN THIS RESPONSE, so the rank and the median reproduce from this record alone rather than from a handful of named countries. THE SELECTION NEEDS Location=ALLAREA: the call returns five degrees of urbanisation per country and the page compares the all-areas figure. Every observation is Nature=E, a WHO estimate. Note how close the ranking is at Australia's position: Portugal is 6.208 and Australia 6.226, so 7th and 8th are separated by two hundredths of a microgram. Omitting areaCode and pinning the year returns every reporting country; the page keeps the 38 OECD members, which is the comparison set the first caveat describes and the only indicator on the page that covers all of them alongside parliamentary representation. Australia's rank and the median are read off this one response.

    • Read from the publication · extracted 16 September 2026

      Read from the publication, not from a call: Indicator 11.6.2 metadata, WHO 2021 global air quality guideline for annual mean PM2.5, SDG Indicators Global Database

      • 1.405 µg/m³ · 2021

      The guideline is a health threshold the WHO sets, not an Australian measurement, so it is its own record and the charts draw it as a reference line. The SDG Indicators Global Database serves this as series metadata rather than as an observation, so there is no call to name; the figures beside it on the page cite the call that returned them.

    Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database, indicator 11.6.2 (custodian agency: World Health Organization), extracted 16 September 2026. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  2. [2]United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 5.5.1, seats held by women in national parliaments, Extracted September 2026
    Vintage: Series SG_GEN_PARL. Seats in the single or lower chamber as at 1 January of the year shown, from the IPU Parline database. An election changes the figure reported for the following January, not for the year the election was held.
    • API Calls: · extracted 16 September 2026
      UNSD-SDG:SG_GEN_PARLhttps://unstats.un.org/SDGAPI/v1/sdg/Series/Data?seriesCode=SG_GEN_PARL&pageSize=20000&timePeriodStart=2026&timePeriodEnd=2026

      ALL 38 OECD MEMBERS IN THIS RESPONSE, so the rank and the median reproduce from this record alone rather than from a handful of named countries. Seats in the single or lower chamber at 1 January. Nature=C throughout. Iceland is 46.03 and Australia 46.00, so third and fourth place are separated by three hundredths of a point. The cross-country counterpart of the Australian series: the same indicator, one year, every reporting country, with the 38 OECD members kept. Australia's own history — below the median as recently as 2016 — comes from this same call's earlier years being visible in the Australia-only series, and the rank here is read off the 2026 response.

    • API Calls: · extracted 16 September 2026
      UNSD-SDG:SG_GEN_PARLhttps://unstats.un.org/SDGAPI/v1/sdg/Series/Data?seriesCode=SG_GEN_PARL&pageSize=20000&timePeriodStart=2016&timePeriodEnd=2016
      • 2.4027.86 % of seatsderived here · 2016 · Median of the 38 OECD members, 2026OECD median· the median of the OECD members' values in this response
      • 2.4126.67 % of seats · 2016 · AustraliaSG_GEN_PARL.36

      The 2016 counterpart of the 2026 comparison record, added because the page asserts that Australia was below the OECD median "as recently as 2016" and nothing retrieved supported it: the Australia-only series gives Australia's 26.67 and says nothing about where the other members sat. Now retrieved: the median of the 38 members at 1 January 2016 was 27.86 and Australia was 21th. The claim is true; it simply had no call behind it.

    Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database, indicator 5.5.1 (custodian agency: Inter-Parliamentary Union), extracted 16 September 2026. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  3. [3]United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 8.4.2, domestic material consumption, Extracted September 2026
    Vintage: Series EN_MAT_DOMCMPC, domestic material consumption per capita, all products (product code ALP), 2022. Compiled by the UN Environment Programme from the Global Material Flows Database. Australia's total reconciles with the sum of its published product components. Twelve reporting areas, including Japan and New Zealand, carry values at or below zero for every year from 2019 to 2022 and are not usable.
    Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database, indicator 8.4.2 (custodian agency: UN Environment Programme), extracted 16 September 2026. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  4. [4]United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 8.6.1, young people not in employment, education or training, Extracted September 2026
    Vintage: Series SL_TLF_NEET_19ICLS, aged 15–24, compiled by the ILO from ABS Labour Force Survey microdata on the 19th ICLS standard. The 13th ICLS series SL_TLF_NEET is a separate series and is not spliced to it.
    Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database, indicator 8.6.1 (custodian agency: International Labour Organization), extracted 16 September 2026. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  5. [5]United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database — indicator 17.2.1, official development assistance, 2000–2025
    Vintage: Custodian data supplied by the OECD Development Assistance Committee, DAC database 2026 release. Grant-equivalent series (DC_ODA_TOTGGE, DC_ODA_TOTLGE) begin with 2018 data; earlier years are on the net-disbursement basis (DC_ODA_TOTG) and the two are not a single series. The 2025 observations are OECD early estimates and are revised when detailed data is published. Values in constant 2024 United States dollars. The least-developed-countries series (DC_ODA_LDCG) is net disbursements including imputed multilateral flows.
    • API Calls: · extracted 16 September 2026
      UNSD-SDG:DC_ODA_TOTGGEhttps://unstats.un.org/SDGAPI/v1/sdg/Series/Data?seriesCode=DC_ODA_TOTGGE&pageSize=4000&timePeriodStart=2025
      • 5.142 reporting countriesderived here · 2025 · totalElements returned by the call, every country reporting DC_ODA_TOTGGE for 2025· the number of rows the call returned, not a value the response publishes
      • 5.21.030721 %whole series · 2025 · NorwayDC_ODA_TOTGGE.578
      • 5.30.992544 %whole series · 2025 · LuxembourgDC_ODA_TOTGGE.442
      • 5.40.849012 %whole series · 2025 · SwedenDC_ODA_TOTGGE.752
      • 5.50.723359 %whole series · 2025 · DenmarkDC_ODA_TOTGGE.208
      • 5.60.612539 %whole series · 2025 · United Arab EmiratesDC_ODA_TOTGGE.784
      • 5.70.579761 %whole series · 2025 · Netherlands (Kingdom of the)DC_ODA_TOTGGE.528
      • 5.80.558135 %whole series · 2025 · GermanyDC_ODA_TOTGGE.276
      • 5.90.501037 %whole series · 2025 · TürkiyeDC_ODA_TOTGGE.792
      • 5.100.459857 %whole series · 2025 · SwitzerlandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.756
      • 5.110.443185 %whole series · 2025 · FinlandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.246
      • 5.120.432325 %whole series · 2025 · QatarDC_ODA_TOTGGE.634
      • 5.130.43152 %whole series · 2025 · United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.826
      • 5.140.42469 %whole series · 2025 · IrelandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.372
      • 5.150.423334 %whole series · 2025 · FranceDC_ODA_TOTGGE.250
      • 5.160.369947 %whole series · 2025 · BelgiumDC_ODA_TOTGGE.56
      • 5.170.345139 %whole series · 2025 · JapanDC_ODA_TOTGGE.392
      • 5.180.337354 %whole series · 2025 · IcelandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.352
      • 5.190.328961 %whole series · 2025 · AustriaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.40
      • 5.200.316411 %whole series · 2025 · CanadaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.124
      • 5.210.296433 %whole series · 2025 · ItalyDC_ODA_TOTGGE.380
      • 5.220.272838 %whole series · 2025 · New ZealandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.554
      • 5.230.271401 %whole series · 2025 · SpainDC_ODA_TOTGGE.724
      • 5.240.235547 %whole series · 2025 · CroatiaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.191
      • 5.250.21574 %whole series · 2025 · SloveniaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.705
      • 5.260.211562 %whole series · 2025 · LithuaniaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.440
      • 5.270.205112 %whole series · 2025 · MaltaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.470
      • 5.280.203341 %whole series · 2025 · Republic of KoreaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.410
      • 5.290.193484 %whole series · 2025 · EstoniaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.233
      • 5.300.183803 %whole series · 2025 · AustraliaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.36
      • 5.310.179775 %whole series · 2025 · LatviaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.428
      • 5.320.178268 %whole series · 2025 · PortugalDC_ODA_TOTGGE.620
      • 5.330.16214 %whole series · 2025 · PolandDC_ODA_TOTGGE.616
      • 5.340.138966 %whole series · 2025 · HungaryDC_ODA_TOTGGE.348
      • 5.350.135476 %whole series · 2025 · RomaniaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.642
      • 5.360.132868 %whole series · 2025 · SlovakiaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.703
      • 5.370.129766 %whole series · 2025 · GreeceDC_ODA_TOTGGE.300
      • 5.380.11688 %whole series · 2025 · BulgariaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.100
      • 5.390.116012 %whole series · 2025 · CzechiaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.203
      • 5.400.112538 %whole series · 2025 · KuwaitDC_ODA_TOTGGE.414
      • 5.410.094008 %whole series · 2025 · United States of AmericaDC_ODA_TOTGGE.840
      • 5.420.063293 %whole series · 2025 · AzerbaijanDC_ODA_TOTGGE.31
      • 5.430.051239 %whole series · 2025 · IsraelDC_ODA_TOTGGE.376

      Omitting areaCode returns every reporter: all 42 rows for 2025 are recorded here, so the rank, the count above 0.7 per cent and every plotted value reproduce from this record alone. Every row carries Nature=C, country data, and the response's own footnote on every row reads "Grant equivalents, Based on OECD, DAC database, 2026, Provisional" — the 2025 figures are provisional and are revised. Which twenty donors are "largest by volume" was settled from the companion call on the level series, https://unstats.un.org/SDGAPI/v1/sdg/Series/Data?seriesCode=DC_ODA_TOTLGE&pageSize=4000&timePeriodStart=2025, sorted descending with European Union institutions dropped because they report ODA and have no GNI to divide it by. That selection is recorded here as a per-observation note rather than as a figure, because it is a selection rule and not a number the page prints. In order: United States of America, Germany, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Japan, France, Canada, Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Italy, Türkiye, Sweden, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, Republic of Korea, Australia, Denmark, United Arab Emirates, Belgium, Ireland, Austria. Luxembourg is second on the ratio and outside the twenty by volume, so the chart shows three of the four reporters at or above 0.7 per cent, not four.

    Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Indicators Global Database, indicator 17.2.1 (custodian agency: OECD Development Assistance Committee), extracted 16 September 2026. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO.

Related questions